![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Nov. 22nd, 2013 09:28 amSo saw this thing on ONTD about random actors from Love, Actually who are getting current buzz. Obviously, I knew Rick Grimes was the guy pining over Keira Knightly, but like I guess its been a really long time since I saw it, so I did not realize the guy who was marrying her was The Operative from Serenity. Also, that Bilbo/Watson (who for the longest time I did not realize was British Jim since I've never watched the British Office) was the body double guy, or the kid was Jojen Reed from GoT. Which also reminds me, I was flicking through the channels and that Doctor Who ep with the fake Doctor guy was on, I totally didn't realize that was the Governor!
TV commentary:
Glee- Some people are freaking out about possible Samchel, but what's the big deal?! In terms of het ships for Rachel, Puck was by far my top choice, but Sam was prolly second. He's a nice, decent guy, and I wanna say until they turned him into more of a himbo, his character was a lot like what I think they intended Finn to be. So whatever, if they did put Rachel with him, it wouldn't be the most horrible thing for this show.
It also gives more of an excuse to bring him to NY and keep the amusing Blam friendship going on. I mean, obviously Blaine is going to be in NY next season, and it seems like they're having Sam pursue this male modeling thing to put him in NYC as well. So it seems like they already have his reason to be there. But look at it this way. Klaine is together, and you have Santana, Rachel, and Sam single. They're not going to hire three new people as LIs for them, it just makes sense to pair two of them off. So either Rachel gets with Santana, or she gets with Sam. I know people are all, "Why does she need anyone at all?" Realistically, she doesn't need anyone right now. She has a school, pursuing her dream career, but this is TV, they're not gonna have the female lead not be with someone.
And its not necessarily a bad thing. As long as they don't let her get defined by her relationship, that she won't forgo her dreams for some boy, I think its fine. ( spoiler cut )
TV commentary:
Glee- Some people are freaking out about possible Samchel, but what's the big deal?! In terms of het ships for Rachel, Puck was by far my top choice, but Sam was prolly second. He's a nice, decent guy, and I wanna say until they turned him into more of a himbo, his character was a lot like what I think they intended Finn to be. So whatever, if they did put Rachel with him, it wouldn't be the most horrible thing for this show.
It also gives more of an excuse to bring him to NY and keep the amusing Blam friendship going on. I mean, obviously Blaine is going to be in NY next season, and it seems like they're having Sam pursue this male modeling thing to put him in NYC as well. So it seems like they already have his reason to be there. But look at it this way. Klaine is together, and you have Santana, Rachel, and Sam single. They're not going to hire three new people as LIs for them, it just makes sense to pair two of them off. So either Rachel gets with Santana, or she gets with Sam. I know people are all, "Why does she need anyone at all?" Realistically, she doesn't need anyone right now. She has a school, pursuing her dream career, but this is TV, they're not gonna have the female lead not be with someone.
And its not necessarily a bad thing. As long as they don't let her get defined by her relationship, that she won't forgo her dreams for some boy, I think its fine. ( spoiler cut )
